|
|
Post by Drew (Chicago Blue Jays) on Nov 28, 2018 21:50:43 GMT -5
This is again another item that has been discussed in several ways over the last couple years. I'd like to make a league decision one way or another.
Rule Proposal #6:
Should a team receive compensation if they choose not to match the highest contract offer to one of their Restricted Free Agents?
|
|
|
|
Post by Scott (Boston Padres) on Dec 4, 2018 8:28:36 GMT -5
This is actually the new RFA compensation rule in DD5.
OWNER COMPENSATION FOR RESTRICTED FREE AGENT SIGNING
If an owner's RFA is signed by another team, he will receive a compensatory minors draft pick in the following season's minor league draft.
AAS = 18.01M+, then MINIMUM 5 yr deal – owner gets an additional first round pick at end of First Round.
AAS = $14.01M to $18M, then MINIMUM 4 yr deal – owner gets an additional second round pick at end of Second Round.
AAS = $10.01M to $14M, then MINIMUM 3 yr deal – owner gets an additional third round pick at end of Third Round.
AAS = $6.01M to $10M, then MINIMUM 2, MAXIMUM 4 yr deal – owner gets an additional fourth round pick at end of Fourth Round.
AAS = up to $6M, then MINIMUM 1, MAXIMUM 3 yr deal – owner gets an additional fifth round pick at end of Fifth Round.
|
|
|
|
Post by Drew (Chicago Blue Jays) on Dec 31, 2018 16:42:16 GMT -5
This rule has passed. With that in mind, we will now need to set up a compensation system. I will post a new poll tomorrow with Scott's proposed system.
|
|
